border 2
Millennium Sign

HALSTEAD
KENT
PARISH COUNCIL
border 1
Bus Timetables
Train Timetables
Sevenoaks Weather
Local Road Reports
Halstead Maps
Wednesday, August 11, 2010

 

You Are Here >>
|Home| |Committees| |Planning| |Halstead Place|
HALSTEAD PLACE
|Planning Decisions| |Halstead Place| |Fort Halstead| |Conservation Area| |Village Design| |Land Assessment| |LDF| |SDC Core Strategy|

At an SDC Development Control meeting on December 4th last year Wards application to build 33 properties at Halstead Place was finally approved, subject to agreement with the Parish Council over a variety of issues.

The Parish Council had a meeting with Wards on March 10th to follow up on the areas where we were still unable to agree with the application.

The following matters were discussed :

  1. The design of the houses. We felt that there should be a greater balance between the various house styles on the site. For example, there are currently no upper-storey tile-hung houses, and we feel there are also too few flint properties. Wards architect will be addressing this matter, and we are still waiting to see revised drawings.
  2. We were unhappy with the siting of a road immediately adjacent to the side wall of one of the listed buildings. Wards have agreed to site the road further away;
  3. We did not want to see site traffic using Stonehouse Lane, and other narrower roads in the village, particularly Otford Lane, because we felt that they were too narrow to support the sizes of vehicles involved. Wards are happy to use other routes;
  4. We also expressed concerns about the working hours on the site, and sought to ensure that there was minimum adverse impact on people living locally to the site. Wards were also concerned about large construction vehicles using the main site entrance, because of its narrowness. It has been agreed that their vehicles will use a temporary access onto the sports field further towards the centre of the village. This will involve a minor (and temporary) realignment of the public footpath at that point, to ensure that walkers are not put in any danger from moving vehicles accessing the site.

Lighting-BollardWards also advised us there there would be a low level lighting scheme on the site. The picture to the left shows they style they wish to use. These lighting bollards will be about 1 metre high, and will be used throughout the site to indicate entrances to properties.

The diagram below also

Council’s response to the 4th Planning Application

 
Halstead Sign

link to the
Halstead Community
Website
a_SatelliteDataIcon

Pavilion Hire Conditions
a_SatelliteDataIcon

Parish Room Hire Conditions
a_SatelliteDataIcon

Pavilion & Parish Room Hire Charges & Information

Councillors

To find out details of the Parish Councillors, please click on this link.
Halstead Place
Halstead Place driveway
Halstead Place Gatehouse

INSPECTOR’S DECISION ON 3RD APPLICATION

In November 12th, 2007 the Planning Inspector rejected Barratt Kent’s appeal against the refusal of their application.

Immediately prior to the appeal Barratt Kent made an amendment to their third application; realising that the footprint of their proposed development was still greater than the footprint of the old school premises, they removed all garages from the planned new properties, thus reducing the footprint to current levels.

In spite of this late change the Inspector still rejected the appeal on a number of grounds :

  • The extent of development.
    He felt that Sevenoaks District Council had been “overgenerous” when they had outlined the area available for development, because it took in “significant areas of undeveloped meadowland between and around the buildings”.
    He also felt that the curtilages of properties would extend out into the Green Belt beyond current development, and would “encroach significantly into the principal areas of the site, both inside and outside the delineated area”. He felt that this would “have an adverse impact on the character of the Green Belt”.
     
  • The design of the proposed development
    The Inspector felt that the new houses “are effectively standard house types, repeated throughout the development, irrespective of location. Whilst there has evidently been a detailed study of local materials and form, this has not resulted in anything other than debased imitations of local buildings and token gestures towards local architectural style”.
     
  • The layout of the proposed development
    The Inspector felt that the scheme layout did not relate well to the site in terms of structure or the history of the site. He felt it was “an estate form…...…an essentially suburban approach (which was) entirely inappropriate for this unique and historic rural site”.
     
  • Setting of the Listed Buildings
    The Inspector felt that the Barratt proposals were inappropriate in relation to the treatment of the listed buildings. “Insufficient weight appears to have been given to the need to find the most appropriate way of incorporating these historic buildings into the development of the site”.
     
  • Overall View
    The Inspector was particularly scathing about Barratts overall approach to the development. “In my view, there has been a blinkered approach to the design and layout of this scheme. There seems to have been a drive to maximise the number of dwellings on the site rather than to produce a design specific to a place reflecting the unique characteristics of the site. The development would not be compatible, in terms of scale and site coverage or with the nature of the site…”.

    The Parish Council has always felt that these particular issues were not adequately dealt with by the proposals, and therefore they have formed the basis of the continued PC objections to all three applications to develop the site.

    If anyone would like a full copy of the Inspector’s Appeal Decision, please contact the Clerk.
     

Copyright Halstead Parish Council 2006 - 09. All rights reserved.